Adverse events in surgical patients: incidence, characteristics and associated factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-4425202328890890Keywords:
Patient safety, Medical errors, Surgical procedures, operative, Perioperative nursingAbstract
Objective: To estimate the incidence of adverse events and identify the factors associated with their occurrence in surgical patients at a general reference hospital in the interior of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Method: Retrospective and documentary study carried out in 851 medical records of patients undergoing surgical procedures. To track and identify the adverse event, an adaptation of the Global Trigger Tool method was used, with double review of documents independently and data analysis using descriptive statistics, x2 test, Student’s t-test and logistic regression. Results: 145 adverse events were identified in 108 medical records, more than half related to complications at the surgical site, such as bleeding and surgical site infections. Prolonged hospital stay, duration of surgery longer than four hours and surgical procedures classified as contaminated were associated with greater chances of adverse event occurrence (p<0.001). Conclusion: Adverse events in surgical care have a high frequency and impact of damage caused, reinforcing the importance of strategies aimed at the safety of surgical patients.
References
Decormeille G, Maurer-Maouchi V, Mercier G, Debock S, Lebrun C, Rouhier M, et al. Adverse events in intensive care and continuing care units during bed-bath procedures: the prospective observational NURSIng during critical carE (NURSIE) study. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(1):e20-e30. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004745
Wain H, Kong V, Bruce J, Laing G, Clarke D. Analysis of surgical adverse events at a major University Hospital in South Africa. World J Surg. 2019;43(9):2117-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05008-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05008-9
Tanaka K, Erikssom L, Asher R, Obermair A. Incidence of adverse events, preventability and mortality in gynaecological hospital admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust N Z J Obster Gynaecol. 2019;59(2):195-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12937
Cheng A, Kessler D, Mackinnon R, Chang TP, Nadkarni VM, Hunt EA, et al. Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements. Simul Healthc. 2016;11(4):238-48. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000150 7. Machin D, Campbell M, Fayers P, Pinol A. A sample size tables for clinical studies. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Blackwell Science; 1997.
Griffin F, Resar R. IHI Global trigger tool for measuring adverse events. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2009.
Sousa LAO, Fonteles MMF, Monteiro MP, Mengue SS, Bertoldi AD, Dal Pizzol TS, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of adverse drug events in Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2018;34(4):e00040017. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00040017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00040017
Turrentine FE, Schenk WG, McMurry TL, Tache-Leon CA, Jones RS. Surgical errors and the relationships of disease, risks, and adverse events. Am J Surg. 2020;220(6):1572-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.05.004
Srinivasa S, Gurney J, Koea J. Potential consequences of patient complications for surgeon well-being: a systematic review. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(5):451-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5640
Sataloff RT. Adverse surgical events: effects on the surgeon. Ear Nose Throat J. 2020;99(4):225-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561319827704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561319827704
Roque KE, Tonini T, Melo ECP. Eventos adversos na unidade de terapia intensiva: impacto na mortalidade e no tempo de internação em um estudo prospectivo. Cad Saúde Pública. 2016;32(10):e00081815. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00081815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00081815
Hibbert PD, Molloy CJ, Hooper TD, Wiles LK, Runciman WB, Lachman P et al. The application of the Global Trigger Tool: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(6):640-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw115
Ruiz OG, Lázaro JPP, López RP. Rendimiento y optimización de la herramienta trigger en la detección de eventos adversos en pacientes adultos hospitalizados. Gac Sanit. 2017;31(6):453-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.01.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.01.014
Pineda-Pérez D, Puentes-Rosas E, Rangel-Chávez NJ, Garrido-Latorre F. Eventos quirúrgicos adversos em três instituciones públicas de salud mexicanas. Salud Pública Méx. 2011;53(Suppl 4):484-90.
Nonaka M, Morishita T, Yamada K, Fujioka S, Higuchi MA, Tsuboi Y, et al. Surgical management of adverse events associated with deep brain stimulation: a single-center experience. SAGE Open Med. 2020;8:2050312120913458. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312120913458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312120913458
Suliburk JW, Buck QM, Pirko CJ, Massarweh NN, Barshes NR, Singh H, et al. Analysis of human performance deficiencies associated with surgical adverse events. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(7):e198067. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8067
Maia CS, Freitas DRC, Gallo LG, Araújo WN. Notificações de eventos adversos relacionados com a assistência à saúde que levaram a óbitos no Brasil, 2014-2016. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2018;27(2):e2017320. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742018000200004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742018000200004
van der Vlis TAMB, van de Veerdonk MMGH, Ackermans L, Leentjens AFG, Janssen MLF, Kuijf ML, et al. Surgical and hardware-related adverse events of deep brain stimulation: a ten-year single-center experience. Neuromodulation. 2022;25(2):296-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2021.12.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2021.12.011
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Luciane Ribeiro de Faria, Andre Luiz Silva Alvim, Hérica Silva Dutra, Fábio da Costa Carbogim, Claudilene Fernandes da Silva, Ronaldo Rocha Bastos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By publishing in Revista SOBECC, authors retain the copyright of their article and agree to license their work using a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International Public License, thus accepting the terms of this license. The CC BY 4.0 license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and create from the published article, even for commercial purposes, provided they give due credit to the creators of the work (authors of the article).
The authors grant to Revista SOBECC the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher, and grant to the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: (1) to sell and/or distribute the article in hard copies and/or in electronic format; (2) to distribute parts and/or the entire article in order to promote the journal through the internet and other digital and printed media; (3) to record and reproduce the article in any format, including digital media.
With this license, authors can enter into separate contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the article (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in Revista SOBECC. Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online after publication in the Revista SOBECC, as this can increase the article's visibility and impact.
In line with the journal's policies, each published article will be assigned a CC BY 4.0 license, which will be visible on the abstract page and in the PDF of each article with the respective link to the license terms.