Post-operative of bioprosthesis aortic catheter implant: nursing intervention
Keywords:
Aortic valve stenosis. Heart valve prosthesis implantation. Bioprosthesis. Nursing assessment. Postoperative care.Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease; affects approximately 3% of the elderly population, underwent implantation of aortic bioprosthesis catheter. Nurses need to improve knowledge, to develop treatment protocols and care. Objective: Propose nursing interventions for postoperative patients treated for AS catheter. Method: Retrospective, quantitative research; composite sample of the Registro Brasileiro de Implantepor Cateter de Bioprótese Valvar Aórtica, with 418 patients between January 2008 and February 2013. Results: The mean age was 81.5 years, 348 were in functional class III or IV cardiac arrest; complications with the highest incidence: left bundle branch block (129 patients), atrioventricular block (110) and the need for pacemaker implantation (83). Conclusion: We propose the nursing interventions for evaluation of neurological function, vascular, hematologic, renal, cardiac, vital signs, and pain control.References
Brito Júnior FS, Abizaid A, Almeida BO, Caixeta A, Tarasoutchi F, Grube E, et al. Implante por cateter de bioprótese valvar para tratamento de estenose aórtica: experiência de três anos. Arq bras cardiol. 2012;99(2):697-705
Tarasoutchi F, Montera MW, Grinberg M, Barbosa MR, Piñeiro DJ, Sánchez CRM, et al. Diretriz Brasileira de Valvopatias – SBC 2011. I Diretriz interamericana de valvopatias – SIAC 2011. Arq bras cardiol. 2011;97(5 Supl 1):1-67.
Brito Júnior FS, Lemos Neto PA, Siqueira D, Sarmento-Leite R, Mangione JA, Carvalho LA, et al. Consenso de especialistas sobre o implante por cateter de bioprótese valvares para o tratamento da estenose aórtica de alto risco cirúrgico: relato da sociedade brasileira de hemodinâmica e cardiologia intervencionista. Rev Bras Cardiol Invasiva. 2011;19(2):200-7.
Gaia DF, Palma JH, Ferreira CBN, Souza JAM, Agreli G, Guilhen JCS, et al. Implante transapical de valva aórtica: resultados de uma nova prótese brasileira. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2010;25(3):293-302.
Roques F, Michel P, Goldstore AR, Nashef SAM. The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1-2.
Brito Júnior FS, Siqueira D, Sarmento-Leite R, Carvalho LA, Lemos Neto PA, Mangione JA, et al. Racional e desenho do registro brasileiro de implante de bioprótese aórtica por cateter. Rev Bras Cardiol Invasiva. 2011;19(2):145-52.
Brito Júnior FS, Carvalho LA, Siqueira D, Dias JC, Mangione JA, Leite RS, et al. Acesso pela artéria subclávia para implante por cateter da bioprótese valvar aórtica Corevalve®: dados do registro brasileiro. Rev bras cardiol Invasiva. 2012;20(3):247-52.
Leon MB, Piazza N, Nikolsky E, Blackstone EH, Cutlip DE, Kappetein AP et al. Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(3):253-69.
Raiten JM, Gutsche JT, Horak J, Augoustides JGT. Critical care management of patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. F1000 Research. 2013;2(62):1-8.
Bulecheck GM, Butcher HK, Docheterman JM. Classificação das intervenções de enfermagem (NIC). 5ª ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2010.
Grinberg M, Accorsi TAD. Aortic stenosis in the elderly: a Brazilian perspective. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009;92(2):e36-e39.
Ferreira MCM. Implante valvar aórtico percutâneo: a importância da seleção de pacientes [Internet]. SOCERJ; 2013 [citado 2014 Out 02]. Disponível em: http://socerj.org.br/implante-valvar-aorticopercutaneo- a-importamcia-da-selecao-de-pacientes/
Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P, Piazza N, Van Mieghem NM, Blackstone EH, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33:2403-18.
Pereira DAG, Rodrigues RS, Samora GAR, Lage SM, Alencar MCN, Parreira VF, et al. Capacidade funcional de indivíduos com insuficiência cardíaca avaliada pelo teste de esforço cardiopulmonar e classificação da New York Heart Association. Fisioter Pesq. 2012;19(1):52-6.
Stefanini GG, Stortecky S, Cao D, O´Sullivan CJ, Gloekler S, Buellesfeld L, et al. Coronary artery disease severity and aortic stenosis: clinical outcomes according to SYNTAX score in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(37):2530-40.
Mendes GS, Moraes CF, Gomes L. Prevalência de hipertensão arterial sistêmica em idosos no Brasil entre 2006 e 2010. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. 2014;9(32):273-8.
Yamamoto M, Hayashida K, Mouillet G, Meguro K, Watanabe Y, Dubois- Rande JL, et al. Renal function-based contrast dosing predicts acute kidney injury following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(5):479-86.
Nuis RJ, Sinning JM, Rodés-Cabau J, Gotzmann M, Van Garsse L, Kefer J, et al. Prevalence, factors associated with, and prognostic effects of preoperative anemia on short and long term mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(6):625-34.
Falcão G. Substituição percutânea da válvula aórtica (TAVI) em doentes com estenose aórtica: revisão bibliográfica e análise da casuística do CHVNG [dissertação]. Covilhã: Universidade da Beira do Interior; 2011.
Stortecky S, Buellesfeld L, Wenaweser P, Windecker S. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: prevention and management of complications. Heart [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2014; 98(supl 4):52-64.
Alves AFG, Grassia RCF, Carvalho R. Cirurgia robótica de revascularização miocárdica: em busca de evidência científica no uso da tecnologia do século XXI. Rev. SOBECC. 2012;17(3):31-42.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By publishing in Revista SOBECC, authors retain the copyright of their article and agree to license their work using a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International Public License, thus accepting the terms of this license. The CC BY 4.0 license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and create from the published article, even for commercial purposes, provided they give due credit to the creators of the work (authors of the article).
The authors grant to Revista SOBECC the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher, and grant to the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: (1) to sell and/or distribute the article in hard copies and/or in electronic format; (2) to distribute parts and/or the entire article in order to promote the journal through the internet and other digital and printed media; (3) to record and reproduce the article in any format, including digital media.
With this license, authors can enter into separate contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the article (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in Revista SOBECC. Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online after publication in the Revista SOBECC, as this can increase the article's visibility and impact.
In line with the journal's policies, each published article will be assigned a CC BY 4.0 license, which will be visible on the abstract page and in the PDF of each article with the respective link to the license terms.