Evaluation of the adherence to the safe surgery checklist at the Public University Hospital
Keywords:
Patient Safety. Surgical Procedures, Operative. Nursing.Abstract
Objective: to evaluate the adherence to the checklist procedure in surgeries performed in a public teaching hospital and to identify the patient’s profile regarding its use. Method: a descriptive study methodology was performed, which was conducted at the surgical ward of the Hospital Universitário de Londrina-PR from August to December 2014. Four hundred perioperative verification instruments were analyzed. Results: there was a predominance of male patients (55.5%), aged 21–40 years, and the predominant medical specialty was orthopedics. After 5 years of implementation and a second reformulation of the checklist, there was a considerable decrease in the number of unfilled instruments (blank), but there was an increase in the number of incomplete instruments. Conclusion: the adherence to the checklist needs to be improved to contribute to the reduction of adverse events, which may affect surgical patients and is a challenge for institutions and their staff.References
Organização Mundial de Saúde. Segundo desafio global para a segurança do paciente: Manual: cirurgias seguras salvam vidas (orientações para cirurgia segura da OMS). Rio de Janeiro: Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde; Ministério da Saúde; Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária; 2009.
World Health Organization. World alliance for patient safety. Implementation manual surgical safety Checklist (first edition). Safe Surgery saves lives. [Internet]. 2008. [acesso em 2014 dez 08]. Disponível em: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/tools_resources/SSSL_Manual_finalJun08.pdf
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Assistência Segura: Uma Reflexão Teórica Aplicada à Prática. Série Segurança do Paciente e Qualidade em Serviços de Saúde. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Brasília: Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária; 2013 [acesso em 2015 jan 11]. Disponível em: http://www20.anvisa.gov.br/segurancadopaciente/images/documentos/livros/Livro1-Assistencia_Segura.pdf
Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, et al. A surgical safety checklist reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491-9.
World Health Organization – WHO. Patient safety [Internet]. [acesso em 2015 jan 06]. Disponível em: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/en/
Freitas MR, Antunes AG, Lopes BNA, Fernandes FC, Monte LC, GSAZ. Avaliação de adesão ao checklist de cirurgia segura da OMS em cirurgias urológicas e ginecológicas, em dois hospitais de ensino de Natal, Rio Grande do Norte Brasil. Cad.Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, 30(1):137-148, jan, 2014.
Santos CM; Caregnato RCA; Moraes CS. Equipe cirúrgica: adesão à meta 1 da cirurgia segura. Rev SOBECC. 2013;18(4):47-56.
Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Lashoher A, Dziekan G, Boorman DJ, Berry WR, et al. Perspectives in quality: designing the WHO surgical safety checklist. Intern J Qual Health Care. 2010;22(5):365-70.
The National Quality Forum. Safe practices for better healthcare: a consensus report update. Washington DC: The National Quality Forum; 2009. [Internet]. [acesso em 2015 jul 06]. Disponível em: https://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2009/03/Safe_Practices_for_Better_Healthcare%E2%80%932009_Update.aspx
Conley DM, Singer SJ, Edmondson L, Berry WR, Gawande AA. Effective surgical safety checklist implementation. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(5):873-9.
Carney BT, West P, Neily J, Mills PD, Bagian JP. Differences in nurse and surgeon perceptions of teamwork: implications for use of a briefing checklist in the OR. AORN J. 2012;91(6):722-9.
Martins GS, Carvalho R. Realização do timeout pela equipe cirúrgica: facilidades e dificuldades. Rev SOBECC. 2014;19(1):18-25.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria n. 529, 01 de abril de 2013. Instituição do Programa Nacional de Segurança do Paciente. Brasília: Diário Oficial da União; 2013.
de Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RMPH, Van Andel G, Schlack WSS, Gouma DJ, et al. Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Eng J Med. 2010;363(20):1928-37.
Vendramini RCR, Silva EA, Ferreira KASL, Possari JF, Baia WRM. Segurança do paciente em cirurgia oncológica: experiência do Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2010;44(3):827-32.
Landrigan CP. Condições de trabalho e bem-estar dos profissionais de saúde: compartilhamento de lições internacionais para melhorar a segurança do paciente. J Pediatr. 2011;87(6):463-5.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations - JCAHO. Joint Commission Internactional. Padrões de acreditações da Joint Commission International para hospitais [Internet]. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Consórcio Brasileiro de Acreditação. 2010 [cited 2015 Jan 07]. Available from: http://www.jointcommission.org/safe_surgery_checklist/
Souza LP, Bezerra ALQ, Silva AEBC , Carneiro FS, Paranaguá TTB , Lemos LF. Eventos adversos: instrumento de avaliação do desempenho em centro cirúrgico de um hospital universitário. Rev Enferm UERJ. 2011;19(1):127-33.
Badessa GG. 4º passo: time out (Check-list de cirurgia segura). Anestesia Segura, Serviços Médicos de Anestesia, São Paulo-SP. [Internet]. 2010. [acesso em 2015 Jan 30]. Disponível em: http://www.anestesiasegura.com/2010/06/4-passo-time-out- check-listde- cirurgia.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By publishing in Revista SOBECC, authors retain the copyright of their article and agree to license their work using a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International Public License, thus accepting the terms of this license. The CC BY 4.0 license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and create from the published article, even for commercial purposes, provided they give due credit to the creators of the work (authors of the article).
The authors grant to Revista SOBECC the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher, and grant to the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: (1) to sell and/or distribute the article in hard copies and/or in electronic format; (2) to distribute parts and/or the entire article in order to promote the journal through the internet and other digital and printed media; (3) to record and reproduce the article in any format, including digital media.
With this license, authors can enter into separate contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the article (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in Revista SOBECC. Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online after publication in the Revista SOBECC, as this can increase the article's visibility and impact.
In line with the journal's policies, each published article will be assigned a CC BY 4.0 license, which will be visible on the abstract page and in the PDF of each article with the respective link to the license terms.