Perception of patients and surgeons regarding self-demarcation of surgical sites for elective surgery: a pilot study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-4425202227799Keywords:
Procedimentos cirúrgicos eletivos. Segurança do paciente. Autocuidado. Centro cirúrgico hospitalar. Demarcação de sítio cirúrgicoAbstract
Objective: To measure the accuracy rate in the self-demarcation of laterality performed by elective surgery patients in the immediate preoperative period and to analyze the perception of patients and surgeons regarding this practice. Method: Cross-sectional study developed from June to December 2018, in a private hospital in southern Brazil. The sample consisted of 105 patients undergoing elective surgical procedures for ambiguous organs, who answered a questionnaire about the demarcation of the surgical site. Data were evaluated using descriptive analysis. Results: 105 questionnaires were analyzed, of which three were excluded because they were incomplete, thus, the sample consisted of 102 documents. All patients performed the self-demarcation in the correct site. Among participants, 93% of patients and 99% of surgeons reported feeling confident about self-demarcation. Conclusion: Self-demarcation may complement care practice, consisting of another safety barrier and promoting the patient’s participation as a care agent, but it does not replace confirmation by the surgeon in the preoperative period.
References
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system: a report of the Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Washington: National Academy Press; 2000.
Martins M. Qualidade do cuidado de saúde. In: Sousa P, Mendes W, orgs. Segurança do paciente: conhecendo os riscos nas organizações de saúde. 2a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz; 2019. p. 27-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7476/9788575416419.0004
Mills DH. Medical insurance feasibility study. A technical summary. West J Med. 1978;128(4):360-5. PMID: 664637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107755877803500403
Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG, Localio AR, Barnes BA, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(6):377-84. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199102073240605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199102073240605
World Health Organization. First global patient safety challenge: clean care is safer care. [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. [acessado em 01 mar. 2022] Disponível em: https://www.who.int/patientsafety/events/05/GPSC_Launch_ENGLISH_FINAL.pdf?ua=1
World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for safe surgery 2009. Safe surgery saves lives. [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. [acessado em 01 mar. 2022] Disponível em: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44185/9789241598552_eng.pdf;jsessionid =BDF48D06B8BD2FECD3837C7C71798BBC?sequence=1
Kwaan MR, Studdert DM, Zinner MJ, Gawande AA. Incidence, patterns, and prevention of wrong-site surgery. Arch Surg. 2006;141(4):353-7; discussion 357-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.141.4.353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.141.4.353
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Gabinete do Ministro. Portaria no 2.095, de 24 de setembro de 2013. Aprova os protocolos básicos de segurança do paciente. [Internet] Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2013. [acessado em 01 mar. 2022] Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2013/prt2095_24_09_2013.html
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Gabinete do Ministro. Portaria no 1.377, de 9 de julho de 2013. Aprova protocolos de segurança do paciente [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2013. [acessado em 01 mar. 2022] Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2013/prt1377_09_07_2013.html
Silva ACA, Silva JF, Santos LRO, Avelino FVSD, Santos AMR, Pereira AFM. A segurança do paciente em âmbito hospitalar: revisão integrativa da literatura. Cogitare Enfermagem. 2016;21(5):1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/ce.v21i5.37763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/ce.v21i5.37763
Bergal LM, Schwarzkopf R, Walsh M, Tejwani NC. Patient participation in surgical site marking: can this be an additional tool to help avoid wrong-site surgery? J Patient Saf. 2010;6(4):221-5. PMID: 21500609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181fd19ec
Topics in Patient Safety TIPS. Special Edition: JCAHO Patient Safety Goals 2003. VA National Center for Patiente Safety. 2002;2(5). [acessado em 01 mar. 2022] Disponível em: https://www.patientsafety.va.gov/docs/TIPS/TIPSDec02.pdf
Bathla S, Chadwick M, Nevins EJ, Seward J. Preoperative site marking: are we adhering to good surgical practice? J Patient Saf. 2021;17(6):e503-e508. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000398
Motta Filho GR, Silva LFN, Ferracini AM, Bähr GL. Protocolo de cirurgia segura da OMS: o grau de conhecimento dos ortopedistas brasileiros. Rev Bras Ortop. 2013;48(6):554-62. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2013.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2013.08.002
Bohomol E, Tartali JA. Eventos adversos em pacientes cirúrgicos: conhecimento dos profissionais de enfermagem. Acta Paul Enferm. 2013;26(4):376-81. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002013000400012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002013000400012
Gutierres LS, Santos JLG, Barbosa SFF, Maia ARC, Koerich C, Gonçalves N. Adesão aos objetivos do Programa Cirurgias Seguras Salvam Vidas: perspectiva de enfermeiros. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2019;27:e3108. http://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2711.3108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2711.3108
Silva PHA, Conde MBC, Martinasso PF, Maltempi RP, Jacon JC. Cirurgia segura: análise da adesão do protocolo por médicos e possível impacto na segurança do paciente. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2020;47:e20202429. http://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20202429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20202429
Schäfli-Thurnherr J, Biegger A, Soll C, Melcher GA. Should nurses be allowed to perform the pre-operative surgical site marking instead of surgeons? A prospective feasibility study at a Swiss primary care teaching hospital. Patient Saf Surg. 2017;4;11:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-017-0125-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-017-0125-1
Conselho Regional de Enfermagem de São Paulo. Parecer COREN-SP CT 052/2013. PRCI no 102.600. Tickets no 290.931, 292.084. Ementa: Protocolo cirurgia segura – demarcação de lateralidade, responsabilidade da realização[Internet]. 2013 [acessado em 01 mar. 2022] Disponível em: https://portal.coren-sp.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Parecer_052_Lareralidade_Cirurgica_Revis_%20aprovado.pdf
Hainsworth T. The NPSA recommendations to promote correct-site surgery. Nursing Times. 2005;101(12):28. [Internet] [acessado em 01 mar. 2022] Disponível em: https://www.nursingtimes.net/clinical-archive/perioperative-nursing/the-npsa-recommendations-to-promote-correct-site-surgery-22-03-2005/
Reiter K. A look at best practices for patient education in outpatient spine surgery. AORN J. 2014;99(3):376-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2014.01.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2014.01.008
Costa DG, Moura GMSS, Pasin SS, Costa FG, Magalhães AMM. Experiência do paciente na coprodução de cuidados: percepções acerca dos protocolos de segurança do paciente. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2020;28:e3272. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3352.3272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3352.3272
Fowler Jr FJ, Gallagher PM, Drake KM, Sepucha KR. Decision dissonance: evaluating an approach to measuring the quality of surgical decision making. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39(3):136-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39020-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1553-7250(13)39020-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 LARISSA DE SIQUEIRA GUTIERRES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By publishing in Revista SOBECC, authors retain the copyright of their article and agree to license their work using a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International Public License, thus accepting the terms of this license. The CC BY 4.0 license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and create from the published article, even for commercial purposes, provided they give due credit to the creators of the work (authors of the article).
The authors grant to Revista SOBECC the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher, and grant to the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: (1) to sell and/or distribute the article in hard copies and/or in electronic format; (2) to distribute parts and/or the entire article in order to promote the journal through the internet and other digital and printed media; (3) to record and reproduce the article in any format, including digital media.
With this license, authors can enter into separate contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the article (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in Revista SOBECC. Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online after publication in the Revista SOBECC, as this can increase the article's visibility and impact.
In line with the journal's policies, each published article will be assigned a CC BY 4.0 license, which will be visible on the abstract page and in the PDF of each article with the respective link to the license terms.