Nursing care in electrosurgery: integrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-4425202100020007Keywords:
Eletrocirurgia, Cuidados de enfermagem, Recuperação pós-cirúrgica.Abstract
Objective: To identify the scientific knowledge produced under the care of nursing related to the use of electrosurgery in the intraoperative
period. Method: Integrative review based on the databases: Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), PubMed, Cumulative
Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and in the virtual library Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), using the descriptors “electrosurgery”,
“nursing care” and “enhanced recovery after surgery”, correlated by the Boolean operator and, in Portuguese, English, Spanish and French.
Of the 213 studies we found, seven composed the sample. We used the Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires
(IRAMUTEQ) software, through methods of lexical analysis and similitude. For the analysis of methodological quality, we applied the scientific level
of evidence, according to recommendations from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Results: The publications of 2010 to 2012
stand out, with level of evidence V, indexed in LILACS and CINAHL. In the word cloud, we observed the following terms had higher relative frequency:
“patient”(n=14); “surgical risk” (n=12); “electrosurgery” (n=10); “nurse” (n=8); “knowledge” (n=6); “care” (n=6); and “prevention” (n=5). After the
similitude analysis, we identified the semantic range of more frequent words. Conclusion: There are a few studies in the literature with significant information
to aggregate knowledge and build new analyses.
References
Bisinotto FMB, Dezena RA, Martins LB, Galvão MC, Sobrinho JM, Calçado MS. Burns related to electrosurgery – Report of two cases. Brazilian J Anesthesiol [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Dez 18];67(5):527–34. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rba/v67n5/pt_0034-7094-rba-67-05-0527.pdf
Farias IP, Almeida TG, Lopes RF, Torres BA, Silva RRSM, Trindade RFC, et al. The safe use of eletrosurgery. Rev Enferm UFPE line. 2019 [cited 2020 Dez 17];13(2):538–40. Available from: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/view/237989/31379
Gutierres L, Guedes J, Cechinel C, Antunes F, Sebold L, Lorenzini A. Good practices for patient safety in the operating room: nurses’ recommendations. Rev Bras Enferm [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Nov 11];71(1):2940–7. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/reben/v71s6/0034-7167-reben-71-s6-2775.pdf
Macedo JKSS, Vasconcelos EL. O uso seguro da eletrocirurgia no período intraoperatório: evidências para o cuidado de enfermagem. Res Soc Dev [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2020 Dez 21];10(1):e1210111203. Available from: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11203/10222
Souza LMM, Vieira CM, Serverino S, Antunes V. A Metodologia De Revisão Integrativa Da Literatura Em Enfermagem. Rev Investig em Enferm [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 nov 17];21(2):17–26. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321319742_Metodologia_de_Revisao_Integrativa_da_Literatura_em_Enfermagem.
Mendes KDS, Silveira RC de CP, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto Context - Enferm. 2008;17(4):758–64. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/tce/v17n4/18.pdf
Santos CMC, Pimenta CAM, Nobre MRC. The pico strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2020 out 17];15(3):508–11. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v15n3/v15n3a23.pdf.
Acauan LV, Abrantes CV, Stipp MAC, Trotte LAC, Paes GO, Queiroz ABA. Use of the Iramuteq® Software for Quantitative Data Analysis in Nursing: a Reflective Essay. Reme Rev Min Enferm [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 out 09];24:1–5. Available from: https://cdn.publisher.gn1.link/reme.org.br/pdf/en_e1326.pdf.
Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Gallagher-Ford L, Stillwell SB. Evidence-Based Practice, Step by Step: Sustaining Evidence-Based Practice Through Organizational Policies and an Innovative Model. AJN, Am J Nurs [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2020 out 13];111(9):57–60. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00000446-201109000-00027.
Brito MFP, Galvão CM. Os cuidados de enfermagem no uso da eletrocirurgia. Rev gaúch enferm [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2020 Dez 11];30(2):319–27. Available from: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/RevistaGauchadeEnfermagem/article/view/5733/6691.
Brito MFP, Galvão CM. Protocolo de cuidados no uso de eletrocirurgia monopolar. Rev SOBECC [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2020 Dez 10];3:33–8. Available from: https://revista.sobecc.org.br/sobecc/issue/viewIssue/19/pdf_48.
Olímpio MAC, Sousa VEC, Ponte MAV. Electric scalpel usage and related safety measures: integrative review. Rev SOBECC [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Dez 10];21(3):154. Available from:https://revista.sobecc.org.br/sobecc/article/view/33/pdf_1
Spruce L, Braswell ML. Implementing AORN Recommended Practices for Electrosurgery. AORN J [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2020 Dez 13];95(3):373–87. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2011.12.018.
Afonso CT, Silva AL, Fabrini DS, Afonso CT, Côrtes MGW, Sant’Anna LL. Risco do uso do eletrocautério em pacientes portadores de adornos metálicos. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig [Internet].2010 [cited 2020 nov 12];23(3):183–6. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/abcd/v23n3/v23n3a10.pdf.
Steege AL, Boiano JM, Sweeney MH. Secondhand smoke in the operating room? Precautionary practices lacking for surgical smoke. Am J Ind Med [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 nov 22];59(11):1020–31. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ajim.22614.
Parra RLC, Giannasttasio MB, Diniz TRZ. O conhecimento dos circulantes de sala sobre a utilização do bisturi elétrico. Rev SOBECC [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2020 nov 12];17(4):24–32. Available from: https://revista.sobecc.org.br/sobecc/article/view/170/pdf-a.
Ball K. Surgical smoke evacuation guidelines: Compliance among perioperative nurses. AORN J [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2020 nov 30];92(2):e1. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2009.10.026.
Bisinotto FMB, Dezena RA, Martins LB, Galvão MC, Sobrinho JM, Calçado MS. Burns related to electrosurgery --- Report of two cases. Brazilian J Anesthesiol [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Dez 01];67(5):527–34. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rba/v67n5/0034-7094-rba-67-05-0527.pdf.
Ball K. Protecting patients from surgical smoke. AORN J. 2018;108(6):680–420. Croke L. Guideline for electrosurgical safety. AORN J [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 22];112(1):P9–11. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30480798/.
Souza IB, Tenório HAA, Gomes Junior EL, Neto MLS, Almeida BR, Marques ES. Percepção do cliente no perioperatório sobre o cuidado de enfermagem no centro cirúrgico. Rev Eletrônica Acervo Saúde [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Nov 29];(26):e840. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e840.2019.
Jost MT, Viegas K, Caregnato RCA. Systematization of perioperatory nursing assistance in patient safety: an integrative review. Rev SOBECC[Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Nov 25];23(4):218–25. Available from: https://revista.sobecc.org.br/sobecc/article/view/440/pdf.
Pignot G. Role of the nurse in the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery. Prog en Urol [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Dez 01];29(15):904–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2019.08.269
O’Riley M. Electrosurgery in perioperative practice. J Perioper Pract [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2020 Dez 01];20(9):329–33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/175045891002000903
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Patrício de Almeida Costa, Eduarda Layane da Silva Buriti, Iara Mayanne de Castro Araújo, Andrielly Cavalcante Fonseca, Adriana Montenegro de Albuquerque, Magaly Suênya de Almeida Pinto Abrantes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By publishing in Revista SOBECC, authors retain the copyright of their article and agree to license their work using a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International Public License, thus accepting the terms of this license. The CC BY 4.0 license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and create from the published article, even for commercial purposes, provided they give due credit to the creators of the work (authors of the article).
The authors grant to Revista SOBECC the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher, and grant to the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: (1) to sell and/or distribute the article in hard copies and/or in electronic format; (2) to distribute parts and/or the entire article in order to promote the journal through the internet and other digital and printed media; (3) to record and reproduce the article in any format, including digital media.
With this license, authors can enter into separate contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the article (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in Revista SOBECC. Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online after publication in the Revista SOBECC, as this can increase the article's visibility and impact.
In line with the journal's policies, each published article will be assigned a CC BY 4.0 license, which will be visible on the abstract page and in the PDF of each article with the respective link to the license terms.