Validation of an instrument to register the systematization of perioperative nursing care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-4425201900040005Keywords:
Centros cirúrgicos, Cuidados de enfermagem, Lista de checagem, Processo de enfermagem, Segurança do pacienteAbstract
Objectives: To construct and validate the contents of an instrument to register the systematization of perioperative nursing care. Method: Methodological study conducted in a teaching hospital in Southern Brazil, which included literature review, cross-mapping between unstructured observation and North American Nursing Diagnosis Association taxonomies for instrument construction and application of the Delphi technique for validation, performed between November and December 2018. An electronic form was made available to ten experts to evaluate the objectivity, clarity/understanding, appearance and feasibility of the instrument contents, registered on a Likert scale. The answers obtained were submitted to the content validity index (CVI), and scores ≥0.8 confirmed the content validation. Results: The nine information groups of the instrument were evaluated by expert nurses. The average CVI obtained among all contents was 0.92 in the first round of validation. The results showed that the methodological strategy allowed the construction of contents that represent the clinical need for perioperative nursing records. Conclusion: The implementation of a validated instrument contributes to a safer and more qualified nursing practice.References
Silva JP, Garanhani ML, Peres AM. Systematization of Nursing Care in undergraduate training: the perspective of Complex Thinking. Rev. Latino-Am. Enferm [online]. 2015 [citado 8 nov. 2018];23(1):59-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.0096.2525
Associação Brasileira de Enfermeiros de Centro Cirúrgico, Recuperação Anestésica e Centro de Material e Esterilização. Diretrizes de práticas em enfermagem cirúrgica e processamento de produtos para a saúde. São Paulo: 7ª ed.; 2017.
Saraiva EL; Sousa CS. Critically Ill patients in the Postanesthesia Care Unit: Integrative Review. Rev. SOBECC [online]. 2015 [citado 7 nov. 2018]; 20(2):104-12. https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-4425201500020006.
Ramos IC, Oliveira MAL, Braga VAB. Assistência de enfermagem no pós-operatório de transplante hepático: identificando diagnósticos de enfermagem. Ciênc Cuid Saúde [online]. 2011 [citado 08 nov 2018]; 10(1): 116-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/cienccuidsaude.v10i1.8610.
Ribeiro CP, Silveira CO, Benetti ER, Gomes JS, Stumm EM. Diagnósticos de enfermagem em pacientes no pós operatório de cirurgia cardíaca. Rev Rene [online]. 2015 [citado 9 nov. 2018]; 16(2):159 67. http://dx.doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.2015000200004.
Organização Mundial da Saúde. Segundo desafio global para a segurança do paciente: Manual - cirurgias seguras salvam vidas. Geneva; 2009.
Alpendre F, Cruz E, Dyniewicz A, Mantovani M, Silva A, Santos G. Safe surgery: validation of pre and postoperative checklists. Rev. Latino-Am. Enferm [online]. 2017 [citado 12 nov. 2018]; 25:e2907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1854.2907.
Herdman TH, Kamitsuru S. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Diagnósticos de enfermagem da NANDA-I: definições e classificação: 2018-2020. 11. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2018.
Bulechek GM, Butcher HK, Dochtermn J, Wagner CM. Nic - Classificação das Intervenções de Enfermagem. 6ª Ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2016.
Lucena AF, Barros AL BL. Mapeamento cruzado: uma alternativa para a análise de dados em enfermagem. Acta Paul Enferm [online]. 2005 [citado 17 dez. 2018];18(1):82-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S010321002005000100011.
Brandão ES, Santos I, Lanzillotti RS. Validation of an instrument to assess patients with skin conditions. Acta Paul Enferm [online]. 2013 [citado19 dez. 2018]; 5(26): 460-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002013000500009.
Crozeta K, Roehrs H, Stocco JGD, Meier MJ. Pesquisa metodológica: novos e velhos desafios. In: Anais da 17. Semana Nacional de Pesquisa em Enfermagem; 2013 jun 3-5 [citado 20 dez. 2018]. Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil. Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem; p. 1151-1153. Disponível em: http://www.abeneventos.com.br/anais_senpe/17senpe/pdf/0835po.pdf.
Castro AV, Rezende M. A técnica Delphi e seu uso na pesquisa de enfermagem: revisão bibliográfica. Rev. Min de Enferm [online]. 2009 [citado 20 dez. 2018]; 13(3):429-34. http://dx.doi.org/S141527622009000300016.
Pereira RDM, Alvim NAT. Delphi technique in dialogue with nurses on acupuncture as a proposed nursing intervention. Esc. Anna Nery [online]. 2015 [citado 22 dez. 2018]; 19(1):174-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1414-8145.20150024.
Rodrigues AB, Cunha GH, Aquino CBQ, Rocha SR, Mendes CRS, Firmeza MA et al. Head and neck cancer: validation of a data collection instrument. Rev. Bras. Enferm [online]. 2018 [citado em 22dez. 2018]; 71(4): 1899-906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0227.
Nyholm L, Salmela S, Nyström L. Application in the World of Understanding: Researchers’ Experiences of Participation in Reflective Dialogues. [online]. 2018 [citado em 8 nov. 2018]; 5: 2333393618815006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333393618815006.
Pompeo DA, Rossi LA, Paiva L. Content validation of the nursing diagnosis nausea. Rev Esc Enferm USP [online]. 2014 [citado 23 dez. 2018]; 48(1):48-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420140000100006.
Bertoncello KCG, Sávio B, Ferreira JM, Amante LN, Nascimento ERP. Nursing diagnoses and proposals for nursing interventions for patients in the immediate post-operative period following elective surgery. Cogitare Enferm [online] 2015[citado 23 dez. 2018]; 19(3): 582-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/ce.v19i3.33676.
Lemos CS, Poveda VB, Peniche ACG. Construction and validation of a nursing care protocol in anesthesia. Rev. Latino-Am. Enferm [online]. 2017 [citado 20 dez. 2018]; 25: e2952. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2143.2952.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By publishing in Revista SOBECC, authors retain the copyright of their article and agree to license their work using a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International Public License, thus accepting the terms of this license. The CC BY 4.0 license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and create from the published article, even for commercial purposes, provided they give due credit to the creators of the work (authors of the article).
The authors grant to Revista SOBECC the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher, and grant to the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: (1) to sell and/or distribute the article in hard copies and/or in electronic format; (2) to distribute parts and/or the entire article in order to promote the journal through the internet and other digital and printed media; (3) to record and reproduce the article in any format, including digital media.
With this license, authors can enter into separate contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the article (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in Revista SOBECC. Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online after publication in the Revista SOBECC, as this can increase the article's visibility and impact.
In line with the journal's policies, each published article will be assigned a CC BY 4.0 license, which will be visible on the abstract page and in the PDF of each article with the respective link to the license terms.