Practice of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and patient safety factor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-4425201600010003Keywords:
Patient safety. Antibiotic prophylaxis. Perioperative nursing.Abstract
Objective: To identify the practice of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis adopted by professionals working in the operating room. Method: A descriptive study with a quantitative approach was conducted in 30 surgical center professionals located in the Northwest of Paraná, Brazil. Data collection occurred in 2012 by direct observation. For analysis, we used descriptive statistics. Results: It was found that, in 81 (81%) surgeries, clean, potentially contaminated, and contaminated, surgical antibiotic prophylaxis was performed. However, in most of them (54/66.6%), the antibiotic was administered within 1 hour before the surgical incision. In addition, in six (18.1%) potentially contaminated surgery and one (33%) contaminated, where its use was necessary, the antimicrobial was not used. Conclusion: It was evident that this practice violates the current recommendations, which affects their effectiveness in preventing surgical site infection and compromises patient safety.References
World Health Organization. Conceptual Framework for the International Classification for Patient Safety. World Health Organization [online]; 2009 [citado 2015 nov. 19]. Disponível em: http://www.who.int/ patientsafety/taxonomy/icps_full_report.pdf
Organização Mundial da Saúde. Segundo desafio global para a segurança do paciente: Cirurgias seguras salvam vidas. Rio de Janeiro: Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde; Ministério da Saúde; Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária [online]; 2009 [citado 2014
jun. 20]. Disponível em: http://proqualis.net/sites/proqualis.net/ files/000000483StLuCP.pdf
Ministério da Saúde. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Critérios diagnósticos de infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde [online]; 2013 [citado 2013 jul. 18]. Disponível em: http:// www.anvisa.gov.br/hotsite/segurancadopaciente/documentos/ junho/Modulo%202%20-%20Crit%C3%A9rios%20Diagnosticos%20 IRA%20Saude.pdf
Classen DC, Evans RS, Pestotinik SL, Horn SD, Menlove RL, Burke JP. The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical wound infection. N Engl J Med. 1992;236(5):281-6.
Hohmann C, Eickhoff C, Radziwill R, Schulz M. Adherence to guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery patients in German hospitals: a multicentre evaluation involving pharmacy interns. Infection. 2012;40(2):131-7.
Forbes SS, Stephen WJ, Harper WL, Loeb M, Smith R, Christoffersen P, et al. Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices for Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis: Results of a Pre- and Post intervention Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:336-41.
Meeks DW, Lally KP, Carrick MM, Lew DF, Thomas EJ, Doyle PD, et al. Compliance with guidelines to prevent surgical site infections: as simple as 1-2-3? Am J Surg. 2011;201:76-83.
Carlès M, Gindre S, Aknouch N, Goubaux B, Mousnier A, RaucoulesAimé M. Improvement of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective evaluation of personalized antibiotic kits. J Hosp Infect. 2006;(62):372-5.
Schmitt C, Lacerda RA, Padoveze MC, Turrini RN. Applying validated quality indicators to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in a Brazilian hospital: learning what should be learned. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40(10):960-2.
Guilarde AO, Pacheco IT, Gomes LVR, Lima VAB, Pacheco JP, Souza MA. Avaliação da antibioticoprofilaxia cirúrgica em hospital universitário. Rev Patol Trop. [online]. 2009 [citado 2015 jan. 03]; 38(3):179-85. Disponível em: http://www.revistas.ufg.br/index.php/iptsp/article/ view/8124/5843
Levy SM, Phatak UR, Tsao K, Wray CJ, Millas SG, Lally KP, et al. What Is the Quality of Reporting of Studies of Interventions to Increase Compliance with Antibiotic Prophylaxis? J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:770-9.
Ballard KA. Patient Safety: A Shared Responsibility. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing; 2003.
Canadian Nurses Association; University of Toronto Faculty of Nursing. Nurses and patient safety: a discussion paper. Canadian Nurses Association, University of Toronto Faculty of Nursing; 2004 [citado 2016 mar. 05]. Disponível em: https://www.cna-aiic.ca/~/ media/cna/files/en/patient_safety_discussion_paper_e.pdf?la=en.
Pedreira MLG. Práticas de enfermagem baseadas em evidências para promover a segurança do paciente. Acta Paul Enferm. 2009;22:880-1.
Polit DF, Beck CT. Fundamentos de pesquisa em enfermagem: avaliação de evidências para a prática da enfermagem. 7 ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2011.
Ozgediz D, Jamison D, Cherian M, McQueen K. The burden of surgical conditions and access to surgical care in low- and middle-income countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization; 2008 [citado 2013 jul. 18];86(8). Disponível em: http://www.who.int/bulletin/ volumes/86/8/07-050435/en/.
Organização Mundial da Saúde. A crescente ameaça da resistência antimicrobiana. Organização Mundial da Saúde; 2012 [citado 2016 fev. 18]. Disponível em: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75389/3/ OMS_IER_PSP_2012.2_por.pdf
Spruce L. Back to Basics: Preventing Surgical Site Infections. AORN Journal. 2014;99(5):601-8
Bosk CL, Dixon-Woods M, Goeschel CA, Pronovos TPJ. Reality check for checklists. The Lancet. 2009;374(9688):444–5.
Grazziano ES. Segurança no cuidado em cirurgias: onde estamos? Rev. SOBECC. 2015 [citado 2016 jan. 31]; 20(2):63. Disponível em: http://itpack31.itarget.com.br/uploads/snf/arquivos/revista-sobeccabr-jun.pdf
Ford DA. Advocating for Perioperative Nursing and Patient Safety. Perioperative Nursing Clinics. 2012;7:425-32.
Ministério da Saúde (BR). Portaria nº 529, de 1º de abril de 2013. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By publishing in Revista SOBECC, authors retain the copyright of their article and agree to license their work using a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International Public License, thus accepting the terms of this license. The CC BY 4.0 license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and create from the published article, even for commercial purposes, provided they give due credit to the creators of the work (authors of the article).
The authors grant to Revista SOBECC the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher, and grant to the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: (1) to sell and/or distribute the article in hard copies and/or in electronic format; (2) to distribute parts and/or the entire article in order to promote the journal through the internet and other digital and printed media; (3) to record and reproduce the article in any format, including digital media.
With this license, authors can enter into separate contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the article (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in Revista SOBECC. Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online after publication in the Revista SOBECC, as this can increase the article's visibility and impact.
In line with the journal's policies, each published article will be assigned a CC BY 4.0 license, which will be visible on the abstract page and in the PDF of each article with the respective link to the license terms.