Impact of replacing disposable sterile barrier systems with containers: sustainability and cost savings in hospitals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-44251073%20Keywords:
Sustainable hospitals, Environmental management, Energy efficiency, Conservation of natural resources, Biomedical technologyAbstract
Objective: To compare reusable container systems and disposable sterile barrier systems in terms of waste management, as well as their environmental and economic benefits in hospitals. Methods: A descriptive study conducted through the collection of primary data from two hospitals that implemented sustainable technologies (containers). Waste volumes and costs of sterile barrier systems (flexible/disposable and rigid/reusable) were analyzed. Data collection was carried out in large hospitals over a one-year observation period. Results: An 88% reduction in solid waste generation was observed with the use of containers when replacing the flexible/disposable sterile barrier system (SMS). When comparing total costs of flexible packaging with containers, the initial investment may be offset after the fourth year. Conclusion: The adoption of sustainable technologies leads to a significant reduction in waste, with relevant economic gains, contributing to the strengthening of hospital sustainability in Brazil.
References
1. Bobini M, Cicchetti A. Chasing environmental sustainability in healthcare organizations: insights from the Italian experience. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25(1):978. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13158-x
2. Stockert EW, Langerman A. Assessing the magnitude and costs of intraoperative inefficiencies attributable to surgical instrument trays. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(4):646-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.06.019
3. Francisco MF, Vazquez GH. Monitoramento energético no ambiente hospitalar. R Gest Sust Ambient. 2021;10(1):25-44.
4. World Health Organization. Healthy hospitals, healthy planet, healthy people: addressing climate change in healthcare settings [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2009 [accessed on Sep. 10, 2025]. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/healthy-hospitals-healthy-planet-healthy-people
5. Health Care Without Harm. Health care’s climate footprint: how the health sector contributes to the global climate crisis and opportunities for action [Internet]. 2019 [accessed on Sep. 10, 2025]. Available at: https://global.noharm.org/sites/default/files/documents-files/5961/HealthCaresClimateFootprint_092319.pdf
6. Hospitais Saudáveis. Nossa atuação [Internet]. [accessed on Sep. 10, 2025]. Available at: https://www.hospitaissaudaveis.org
7. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development [Internet]. 2015 [accessed on MMM. DD, YYYY]. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
8. B Braun Sharing Expertise. Aesculap®. Aesculap surgical instruments [Internet]. 2021 [accessed on Sep. 10, 2025]. Available at: https://www.gimaitaly.com/DocumentiGIMA/Manuali/PT/M39410PT.pdf
9. Bahk MS. Smart sterilization contêiner technology: blue wrap innovation. J Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation. 2024;5(1). https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.87966
10. Kirmse G, Graf M. Comparison of the cleaning and drying performance of different instrument tray designs and accessories. Zentralsterilization. 2021;29(1):42-7.
11. Friedericy HJ, van Egmond CW, Vogtländer JG, van der Eijk AC, Jansen FW. Reducing the environmental impact of sterilization packaging for surgical instruments in the operating room: a comparative life cycle assessment of disposable versus reusable systems. Sustainability. 2022;14(1):430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010430
12. Santos BM, Fogliatto FS, Zani CM, Peres FAP. Approaches to the rationalization of surgical instrument trays: scoping review and research agenda. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06142-8
13. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Diretrizes metodológicas: diretriz de avaliação econômica. 2a ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Leia Regina Laureano Rosa, Lucas Grozewicz Scultori, Elaine Ferreira Lasaponari, Cristina Nunes Ferreira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By publishing in Revista SOBECC, authors retain the copyright of their article and agree to license their work using a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International Public License, thus accepting the terms of this license. The CC BY 4.0 license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and create from the published article, even for commercial purposes, provided they give due credit to the creators of the work (authors of the article).
The authors grant to Revista SOBECC the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher, and grant to the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: (1) to sell and/or distribute the article in hard copies and/or in electronic format; (2) to distribute parts and/or the entire article in order to promote the journal through the internet and other digital and printed media; (3) to record and reproduce the article in any format, including digital media.
With this license, authors can enter into separate contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the article (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in Revista SOBECC. Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online after publication in the Revista SOBECC, as this can increase the article's visibility and impact.
In line with the journal's policies, each published article will be assigned a CC BY 4.0 license, which will be visible on the abstract page and in the PDF of each article with the respective link to the license terms.
