Sinais e sintomas relacionados à exposição à fumaça cirúrgica: revisão integrativa

Aryane Apolinario Bieniek, Patricia Aroni, Raquel Gvozd Costa, Renata Perfeito Ribeiro

Resumo


Objetivo: Analisar as evidências científicas disponíveis na literatura sobre os sinais e sintomas relacionados à exposição à fumaça cirúrgica em trabalhadores
do bloco operatório. Método: Revisão integrativa da literatura, com busca nas seguintes bases de dados: Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied
Health Literature, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, Web Of Science e SCOPUS. Resultados: Foram 1.351 estudos pré-selecionados,
sendo 4 por busca manual. Ao fim, obtiveram-se cinco artigos para análise. Os sinais e sintomas encontrados foram: tosse, ardência de faringe, espirros,
rinite, lesão nasofaringe, sensação de corpo estranho na garganta, congestão nasal, inflamação das vias aéreas, lacrimejamento dos olhos, náuseas, vômitos, dor
abdominal, fraqueza, cãibra, cefaleia, sonolência, tonturas, irritabilidade, desconforto (como mau cheiro na roupa). Conclusão: Observaram-se grandes avanços
nas pesquisas propostas, estudos que embasam a intensidade dos sinais e sintomas e orientação dos riscos nocivos que proporcionem aos gestores conhecimento
e fundamentação científica para futuras intervenções tanto contra a proteção ao trabalhador como para prevenção de risco no ambiente de trabalho.


Palavras-chave


Sinais e Sintomas; Fumaça; Eletrocirurgia; Eletrocoagulação; Saúde do trabalhador

Texto completo:

PDF PDF/A (English)

Referências


Navarro-Meza M, González-Baltazar R, Alabama-Rodríguez MG, Carmona-Navarro DE, López- Cardona MG. Síntomas respiratórios usados pelo uso do eletrocauterio em médicos na formação cirúrgica de um hospital do México. Rev. Peru. Med. Exp. Salud Publica. [Internet]. 2013[cited 2019 june 10]; 30 (1): 41-44. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-46342013000100008&lng=es

Kalil J, Pessine FBT, Fidelis CHV, Menezes FH, Palma PCR. Analysis, cromatografia / espectrometria de massas, fumaça gerada por eletrocautério. Rev Col Bras Cir. [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 june 10]; 43 (2): 124-128. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912016002009

Bree K, Barnhill S, Rundell W. The Dangers of Electrosurgical Smoke to Operating Room Personnel: A Review. Workplace Health Saf. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 june 10]; 65(11): 517–526, 2017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079917691063

Souza Porto MF. Análise de riscos nos locais de trabalho: conhecer para transformar. São Paulo: Instituto Nacional de Saúde no Trabalho; 2000.

Polit, DF, Beck, C.T. Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal, and Utilization. (6 ed.). Philadelphia ,USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.

Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers manual: 2011 edition. Adelaide, Australia: Author; 2011.

Ilce A, Yuzden GE, Yavuz van Giersbergen M. The examination of problems experienced by nurses and doctors associated with exposure to surgical smoke and the necessary precautions. J Clin Nurs. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 june 10]; 26 (11-12):1555-1561. Available from: https://doi:10.1111/jocn.13455

Ünver S, Topçu SY, Fındık ÜY. Surgical Smoke, Me and My Circle. International Journal of Caring Sciences. [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 june 10]; 9(2): 697-703. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/30097167/Surgical_Smoke_Me_and_My_Circle_Cerrahi_Duman_Ben_ve_%C3%87evremdekiler

Usta E, Aygin D, Bozdemir H, Uçar N. Ameliyathanelerde Cerrahi Dumanın Etkileri ve Korunmaya Yönelik Alınan Önlemler The Effects of Surgical Smoke in Operating Rooms and Precautions for Protection . HSP. [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 june 10]; 6(1): 17-24. Available from: https://doi10.17681/hsp.403579

Galvão TF, Pansani TSA, Harrad D. Principais itens para relatar Revisões sistemáticas e Meta-análises: A recomendação PRISMA. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 june 10]; 24 (2): 335-342. Available fro: https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742015000200017

Alp E, Bijl D, Bleichrodt RP, Hansson B, Voss A. Surgical smoke and infection control. J Hosp Infect. [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2019 june 10]; 62(1): 1–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2005.01.014

Ball K. Surgical smoke evacuation guidelines: Compliance among perioperative nurses. AORN J. [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2019 june 10]; 92(2): 1-23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2009.10.026

Shah N.R. Commentary On: “Surgical Smoke – A Health Hazard in the Operating Theatre: A Study to Quantify Exposure and a Survey of the Use of Smoke Extractor Systems in UK Plastic Surgery Units”. Ann Med Surg. [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2019 june 10];1(1): 23-24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2049-0801(12)70008-0

Carvalho CRR, Junior CT, Franca, AS. Ventilação mecânica: princípios, análise gráfica e práticas ventilatórias. J Bras Pneumol. [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2019 june 10]; 33 (2): 54-70. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37132007000800002

Gomes, MJM. Ambiente e pulmão. J Bras Pneumol. [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2019 june 10]; 28 (5): 261-269. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-35862002000500004

Mowbray N, Ansell J, Warren N, Wall P, Torkington J. Is Surgical Smoke Harmful to Theater Staff? A Systematic Review. Surg Endosc. [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2019 june 10]; 27 (9): 3100-3107. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2940-5

Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J. Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect. [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2019 june 10]; 113 (7): 823-839. Available fro: https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp.7339

Shi B. Removal of Ultrafine Particles by Intermediate Air Filters in Ventilations Systems, Evaluation of Performance and Analysis of Applications. Ph.D. Dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden. [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2019 june 10]. Available from: http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/165538/165538.pdf

Ulmer BC. The hazards of surgical smoke. AORN J. [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2019 june 10]; 87 (4): 721-734. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2007.10.012

Barrett W L, Garber SM. Surgical smoke - A review of the literature. Is this just a lot of hot air? Surg Endosc. [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2019 june 10]; 17 (6): 979-987. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00464-002-8584-5

Al Sahaf OS, Vega-Carrascal I, Cunningham FO. Chemical composition of smoke produced by high-frequency electrosurgery. Ir J Med Sci. [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2019 june 10]; 176(3): 229-232. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11845-007-0068-0

Hallmo P, Naess O. Laryngeal papillomatosis with papillomavirus DNA contracted by a laser surgeon. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. [Internet]. 1991 [cited 2019 june 10]; 248: 425-427. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01463570

Fencl JL. Guideline Implementation: Surgical Smoke Safety. AORN J. [Internet] 2017 [cited 2019 june 10]; 105(5):488‐497. Available from: https://aornjournal.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1016/j.aorn.2017.03.006

Okgün Alcan A, Yavuz van Giersbergen M, Tanil V, Dinçarslan G, Hepçivici Z, Kurcan Ç, Arikan E, Dere T. Bir üniversite hastanesinde cerrahi duman riskleri ve koruyucu önlemlerin incelenmesi. E. Ü. Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 june 10]; 33(2): 27-35. Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/egehemsire/issue/32885/327169

Choi SH, Kwon TG, Chung SK, Kim TH. Surgical smoke may be a biohazard to surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2019 june 10]; 28(8): 2374‐2380. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00464-014-3472-3

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (OSHA). Safety and Health Topics. Laser/Electrosurgery Plume. Washington: Occupational Safety & Health Administration. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2018 setember 18]. Available from: https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/laserelectrosurgeryplume/

Romano F, Gustén J, De Antonellis S, Joppolo CM. Electrosurgical Smoke: Ultrafine Particle Measurements and Work Environment Quality in Different Operating Theatres. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 june 10]; 14(2): 137. Avalable From: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28146089/

Benson SM, Novak DA, Ogg MJ. Proper use of surgical N95 respirators and surgical masks in the OR. AORN Journal. 2013; 97(4):457-67. Avalable From: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2013.01.015

He X , Reponen T , McKay RT, Grinshpun AS. Effect of Particle Size on the Performance of an N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator and a Surgical Mask at Various Breathing Conditions. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2013; 47(11): 1180-87. Avalable From: https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.829209




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-4425202100030009

Métricas do artigo

Carregando Métricas ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.




Direitos autorais 2021 Aryane Apolinario Bieniek

Rev SOBECC, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. e-ISSN: 2358-2871

Licença Creative Commons Revista SOBECC está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia